A center-right country?

You are viewing an old revision of this post, from March 5, 2013 @ 12:17:11. See below for differences between this version and the current revision.

Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper.
Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper.

I’ve long mounted a soapbox in defense of two related ideas. The first is that average Americans care less about policy specifics than we give ourselves credit for, and that public perception is defined more by soundbites, rhetoric, and presentation than by substance.

The second idea, which follows from the first, is that liberal politicians could — and should — mount a stronger defense of their policies without fear of reprisals from the conservative end of the spectrum. This is not because such reprisals won’t come — unless you’ve been in hiding since 2009, this has been the position of Congressional Republicans since Day 1 — but because holding to one’s principles in the face of political opposition is quite often perceived as indicative of having a better, more sensible policy.

Now, to my endless blathering, you may now add the following academic paper:

Broockman and Skovron find that legislators consistently believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. This includes Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives. But conservative legislators generally overestimate the conservatism of their constituents by 20 points. “This difference is so large that nearly half of conservative politicians appear to believe that they represent a district that is more conservative on these issues than is the most conservative district in the entire country,” Broockman and Skovron write. This finding held up across a range of issues.

The authors conclude:

For those interested in strengthening democratic responsiveness, one tempting conclusion from this analysis is that alternative means of informing legislators about their constituents’ views need to be devised – democratic campaigns and elections appear to do little to update politicians’ perceptions of their constituents. However, on reflection, the fact that candidates and legislators know so little about their constituents and learn so little about them from campaigns and elections is perhaps indicative of a deeper and more basic problem of elite motivation. When Miller and Stokes (1963) conducted their authoritative study of information flows between representatives and their constituencies it was less clear how representatives might ascertain their constituencies’ views with a great deal of precision even if they so desired – reliable district-level opinion surveys were still
relatively rare. However, if today’s elites viewed congruence with majority opinion as a primary goal we would expect considerably more knowledge of this opinion in our sample than we observe; such knowledge is quite inexpensive to obtain relative to the cost of modern campaigns. As with voters’ typically low level of motivation to learn about their representatives (Downs 1957, ch. 13), it thus appears that our respondents must have found little desire to accurately ascertain public opinion on political issues of the very highest salience. Politicians clearly do respond to cues about the political consequences of their actions when taking political positions (e.g. Kollman 1998; Bergan 2009), but accurately ascertaining the state of constituency opinion does not appear to rank fairly highly on their priorities necessary for gaining and maintaining access to political authority.

It’s simply too bad that there’s no institution designed to elucidate the opinions held by both the electorate and their chosen political representatives. An institution that could widely disseminate publicly relevant information on the vital policy issues of the day. An institution that would strip away the gratuitous sideshows, celebrity gossip, and tabloid fare, and focus instead on investigative reporting to enlighten its readers both within and without the halls of power.

We should build such an institution. And I propose we call it The Media.

(Thanks to Andrew Sullivan for flagging this one.)

Enhanced by Zemanta

Post Revisions:

Changes:

March 5, 2013 @ 12:17:11Current Revision
Content
Unchanged: <img class="size-full wp-image-4924" alt="Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper." src="http://archives.jaypinho.com/ wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ Screen-Shot-2013-03-05-at- 12.04.16-PM.png" width="497" height="432" /> Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper.Unchanged: <img class="size-full wp-image-4924" alt="Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper." src="http://archives.jaypinho.com/ wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ Screen-Shot-2013-03-05-at- 12.04.16-PM.png" width="497" height="432" /> Courtesy of the Broockman/Skovron paper.
Unchanged: I've long mounted a soapbox in defense of two related ideas. The first is that average Americans care less about policy specifics than we give ourselves credit for, and that public perception is defined more by soundbites, rhetoric, and presentation than by substance.Unchanged: I've long mounted a soapbox in defense of two related ideas. The first is that average Americans care less about policy specifics than we give ourselves credit for, and that public perception is defined more by soundbites, rhetoric, and presentation than by substance.
Unchanged: The second idea, which follows from the first, is that liberal politicians could -- and should -- mount a stronger defense of their policies without fear of reprisals from the conservative end of the spectrum. This is not because such reprisals won't come -- unless you've been in hiding since 2009, this has been the position of Congressional Republicans since Day 1 -- but because holding to one's principles in the face of political opposition is quite often <em>perceived</em> as indicative of having a better, more sensible policy.Unchanged: The second idea, which follows from the first, is that liberal politicians could -- and should -- mount a stronger defense of their policies without fear of reprisals from the conservative end of the spectrum. This is not because such reprisals won't come -- unless you've been in hiding since 2009, this has been the position of Congressional Republicans since Day 1 -- but because holding to one's principles in the face of political opposition is quite often <em>perceived</em> as indicative of having a better, more sensible policy.
Deleted: Now, to my endless blathering, <a href="http:// www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ wonkblog/wp/2013/03/04/one- study-explains- why-its-tough- to-pass-liberal-laws/" target="_blank">you may now add</a> the following <a href="http:// www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~broockma/ broockman_skovron_asymmetric_ misperceptions.pdf" target="_blank">academic paper</a>: Added: To my endless blathering, <a href="http:// www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ wonkblog/wp/2013/03/04/one- study-explains- why-its-tough- to-pass-liberal-laws/" target="_blank">you may now add</a> the following <a href="http:// www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~broockma/ broockman_skovron_asymmetric_ misperceptions.pdf" target="_blank">academic paper</a>:
Unchanged: <blockquote>Broockman and Skovron find that legislators consistently believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. This includes Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives. But conservative legislators generally overestimate the conservatism of their constituents by 20 points. “This difference is so large that nearly half of conservative politicians appear to believe that they represent a district that is more conservative on these issues than is the most conservative district in the entire country,” Broockman and Skovron write. This finding held up across a range of issues.</blockquote>Unchanged: <blockquote>Broockman and Skovron find that legislators consistently believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. This includes Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives. But conservative legislators generally overestimate the conservatism of their constituents by 20 points. “This difference is so large that nearly half of conservative politicians appear to believe that they represent a district that is more conservative on these issues than is the most conservative district in the entire country,” Broockman and Skovron write. This finding held up across a range of issues.</blockquote>
Unchanged: The authors conclude:Unchanged: The authors conclude:
Deleted: <blockquote>For those interested in strengthening democratic responsiveness, one tempting conclusion from this analysis is that alternative means of informing legislators about their constituents’ views need to be devised – democratic campaigns and elections appear to do little to update politicians’ perceptions of their constituents. However, on reflection, the fact that candidates and legislators know so little about their constituents and learn so little about them from campaigns and elections is perhaps indicative of a deeper and more basic problem of elite motivation. When Miller and Stokes (1963) conducted their authoritative study of information flows between representatives and their constituencies it was less clear how representatives might ascertain their constituencies’ views with a great deal of precision even if they so desired – reliable district-level opinion surveys were still Added: <blockquote>For those interested in strengthening democratic responsiveness, one tempting conclusion from this analysis is that alternative means of informing legislators about their constituents’ views need to be devised – democratic campaigns and elections appear to do little to update politicians’ perceptions of their constituents. However, on reflection, the fact that candidates and legislators know so little about their constituents and learn so little about them from campaigns and elections is perhaps indicative of a deeper and more basic problem of elite motivation. When Miller and Stokes (1963) conducted their authoritative study of information flows between representatives and their constituencies it was less clear how representatives might ascertain their constituencies’ views with a great deal of precision even if they so desired – reliable district-level opinion surveys were still relatively rare. However, if today’s elites viewed congruence with majority opinion as a primary goal we would expect considerably more knowledge of this opinion in our sample than we observe; such knowledge is quite inexpensive to obtain relative to the cost of modern campaigns. As with voters’ typically low level of motivation to learn about their representatives (Downs 1957, ch. 13), it thus appears that our respondents must have found little desire to accurately ascertain public opinion on political issues of the very highest salience. Politicians clearly do respond to cues about the political consequences of their actions when taking political positions (e.g. Kollman 1998; Bergan 2009), but accurately ascertaining the state of constituency opinion does not appear to rank fairly highly on their priorities necessary for gaining and maintaining access to political authority.</blockquote>
Deleted: relatively rare. However, if today’s elites viewed congruence with majority opinion as a primary goal we would expect considerably more knowledge of this opinion in our sample than we observe; such knowledge is quite inexpensive to obtain relative to the cost of modern campaigns. As with voters’ typically low level of motivation to learn about their representatives (Downs 1957, ch. 13), it thus appears that our respondents must have found little desire to accurately ascertain public opinion on political issues of the very highest salience. Politicians clearly do respond to cues about the political consequences of their actions when taking political positions (e.g. Kollman 1998; Bergan 2009), but accurately ascertaining the state of constituency opinion does not appear to rank fairly highly on their priorities necessary for gaining and maintaining access to political authority.</blockquote> 
Unchanged: It's simply too bad that there's no institution designed to elucidate the opinions held by both the electorate and their chosen political representatives. An institution that could widely disseminate publicly relevant information on the vital policy issues of the day. An institution that would strip away the gratuitous sideshows, celebrity gossip, and tabloid fare, and focus instead on investigative reporting to enlighten its readers both within and without the halls of power.Unchanged: It's simply too bad that there's no institution designed to elucidate the opinions held by both the electorate and their chosen political representatives. An institution that could widely disseminate publicly relevant information on the vital policy issues of the day. An institution that would strip away the gratuitous sideshows, celebrity gossip, and tabloid fare, and focus instead on investigative reporting to enlighten its readers both within and without the halls of power.
Unchanged: We should build such an institution. And I propose we call it The Media.Unchanged: We should build such an institution. And I propose we call it The Media.
Unchanged: (Thanks to Andrew Sullivan for <a href="http:// dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/ 03/04/chart-of- the-day-71/" target="_blank">flagging this one</a>.)Unchanged: (Thanks to Andrew Sullivan for <a href="http:// dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/ 03/04/chart-of- the-day-71/" target="_blank">flagging this one</a>.)
Unchanged: <h6 class="zemanta- related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>Unchanged: <h6 class="zemanta- related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
Unchanged: <ul class="zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;">Unchanged: <ul class="zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;">
Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/ 2013/03/politicians- vs-constituents- charts/62730/" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149838507_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/ 2013/03/politicians- vs-constituents- charts/62730/" target="_blank">Why U.S. Politicians Think Americans Are So Conservative When They're Not</a></li>Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/ 2013/03/politicians- vs-constituents- charts/62730/" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149838507_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/ 2013/03/politicians- vs-constituents- charts/62730/" target="_blank">Why U.S. Politicians Think Americans Are So Conservative When They're Not</a></li>
Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/ 03/04/politicians- conservatism_ n_2806684.html" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149753156_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/ 03/04/politicians- conservatism_ n_2806684.html" target="_blank">Study Reveals Massive Conservative Bias Among Politicians</a></li>Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/ 03/04/politicians- conservatism_ n_2806684.html" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149753156_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/ 03/04/politicians- conservatism_ n_2806684.html" target="_blank">Study Reveals Massive Conservative Bias Among Politicians</a></li>
Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.theatlantic.com/politics/ archive/2013/ 03/are-americans- as-conservative-as-their- elected-officials- think/273669/" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149810310_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.theatlantic.com/politics/ archive/2013/ 03/are-americans- as-conservative-as-their- elected-officials- think/273669/" target="_blank">Are Americans as Conservative as Their Elected Officials Think?</a></li>Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.theatlantic.com/politics/ archive/2013/ 03/are-americans- as-conservative-as-their- elected-officials- think/273669/" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149810310_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.theatlantic.com/politics/ archive/2013/ 03/are-americans- as-conservative-as-their- elected-officials- think/273669/" target="_blank">Are Americans as Conservative as Their Elected Officials Think?</a></li>
Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.bloomberg.com/news/2013- 03-04/do-conservatives-actually- want-to-win-elections-ramesh- ponnuru.html" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149776874_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.bloomberg.com/news/2013- 03-04/do-conservatives-actually- want-to-win-elections-ramesh- ponnuru.html" target="_blank">Do Conservatives Actually Want to Win Elections?: Ramesh Ponnuru - Bloomberg</a></li>Unchanged: <li class="zemanta- article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li" style="padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;"><a style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;" href="http:// www.bloomberg.com/news/2013- 03-04/do-conservatives-actually- want-to-win-elections-ramesh- ponnuru.html" target="_blank"><img style="padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;" alt="" src="http://i.zemanta.com/ 149776874_80_80.jpg" /></a><a style="display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;" href="http:// www.bloomberg.com/news/2013- 03-04/do-conservatives-actually- want-to-win-elections-ramesh- ponnuru.html" target="_blank">Do Conservatives Actually Want to Win Elections?: Ramesh Ponnuru - Bloomberg</a></li>
Unchanged: </ul>Unchanged: </ul>
Unchanged: <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http:// www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" src="http://img.zemanta.com/ zemified_e.png?x- id=58c2bf32- 6f41-47e1-b3d2- ffe8fb9c36ce" /></a></div>Unchanged: <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http:// www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" src="http://img.zemanta.com/ zemified_e.png?x- id=58c2bf32- 6f41-47e1-b3d2- ffe8fb9c36ce" /></a></div>

Note: Spaces may be added to comparison text to allow better line wrapping.

About Jay Pinho

Jay is a data journalist and political junkie. He currently writes about domestic politics, foreign affairs, and journalism and continues to make painstakingly slow progress in amateur photography. He would very much like you to check out SCOTUSMap.com and SCOTUSSearch.com if you have the chance.

1 thought on “A center-right country?

What do you think?