Yesterday, Robert Wright wrote a piece called “AIPAC’s Push Toward War” for The Atlantic. In it, he notes:
Late last week, amid little fanfare, Senators Joseph Lieberman, Lindsey Graham, and Robert Casey introduced a resolution that would move America further down the path toward war with Iran.
The good news is that the resolution hasn’t been universally embraced in the Senate. As Ron Kampeas of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports, the resolution has “provoked jitters among Democrats anxious over the specter of war.” The bad news is that, as Kampeas also reports, “AIPAC is expected to make the resolution an ‘ask’ in three weeks when up to 10,000 activists culminate its annual conference with a day of Capitol Hill lobbying.”
In standard media accounts, the resolution is being described as an attempt to move the “red line”–the line that, if crossed by Iran, could trigger a US military strike. The Obama administration has said that what’s unacceptable is for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. This resolution speaks instead of a “nuclear weaponscapability.” In other words, Iran shouldn’t be allowed to get to a point where, should it decide to produce a nuclear weapon, it would have the wherewithal to do so.
At what point are we, as Americans, allowed to stand up and say what needs to be said: It is Israel, not Iran, that presents the greatest danger to the Middle East right now. Their government is unpredictable; it is a coalition government aligned with some truly despicable, racist warmongers (hello, Avigdor Lieberman and Danny Ayalon); and its perpetual saber-rattling, deceptions, lies, and misdirection has played a large role in making the Middle East a constantly volatile region.
There are other provocations, to be sure — most notably the Arab Spring, despotic dictators clinging to power, and so forth. Then, perhaps most obviously, there is Iran itself, whose leader’s anti-Semitic rants and Holocaust denials are certainly cause for concern. But another preemptive strike on a Middle Eastern country based on flimsy evidence? Not only does this sound familiar, but the advocacy for it is led by the same neocons who started us off on our glorious path in Iraq. That these people are still afforded even the tiniest sliver of credibility is testament to our woeful media’s inability to stand up for facts, as well a searing condemnation of the American public’s ever-dwindling attention spans.
Let’s please, please, not make another mistake. Constant war is not the answer.
- MJ Rosenberg: Don’t Bomb Iran, Contain It (Like the USSR) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Bombing Iran: A Real Headache for Israel (alethonews.wordpress.com)
- You: U.S., Israel send mixed messages on Iran (latimes.com)
- The Greater Israel Lobby And Yet Another War (andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com)
- When Netanyahu Crossed the Line (alethonews.wordpress.com)
- The Iran war party and the war skeptics (csmonitor.com)
- No Iran War Please (tbray.org)
- Senators to urge Obama to make Iranian ‘capability’ a red line – Jewish Telegraphic Agency (jta.org)
- Graham Doesn’t Believe Clapper: ‘I’m Very Convinced’ Iran Is Building Nuclear Weapons (thinkprogress.org)
- Senate: Nuclear Containment Is Not an Option With Iran (tarpon.wordpress.com)
- Senators Promise War With ‘Nuclear Capable’ Iran, Don’t Define ‘Capable’ (alternet.org)
There are no revisions for this post.